
Native open-source screen recorder — instant Loom-style shares or Studio editing.
Cap is an open-source screen recorder for creating, editing, and sharing async video messages. It is a native alternative to Loom for teams, creators, developers, and educators who want source code access, self-hosting, and more control over their video sharing workflow.
Cap lets you record your screen, webcam, or both, then share instant links or polish recordings with Studio Mode before exporting.
Cap is a native open-source screen recording app built with Tauri and Rust. It helps users record screen videos, product demos, tutorials, bug reports, onboarding videos, and async team updates.
Unlike fully proprietary screen recording tools, Cap gives teams more control over the software, hosting, data, and sharing infrastructure. You can use Cap Cloud for convenience or self-host Cap Web for more ownership.
Cap is especially useful for:
| Feature | Cap | Loom |
|---|---|---|
| Main use case | Open-source screen recording and async video sharing | Managed async video messaging platform |
| License | Open source, with MIT and AGPL-3.0 components | Proprietary SaaS |
| Deployment | Cap Cloud or self-hosted Cap Web | Managed cloud SaaS |
| Screen recording | Native desktop app for screen and webcam recording | Desktop and browser-based recording |
| Editing | Studio Mode, trimming, captions, chapters, exports | Built-in editing and sharing tools |
| Sharing | Instant links, comments, custom domains, self-hosting options | Instant links, comments, team sharing, managed hosting |
| Data control | High control when self-hosted | Hosted on Loom infrastructure |
| Best for | Teams wanting open-source code, self-hosting, and ownership | Teams wanting a polished managed video messaging product |
| Cost model | Open-source software; infrastructure or optional cloud costs apply | Subscription-based SaaS pricing |
Choose Cap if you want an open-source Loom alternative with native recording, self-hosting, data ownership, and more control over your video infrastructure.
Choose Loom if you want a fully managed proprietary product with minimal setup, mature team workflows, and hosted video sharing out of the box.
Cap and Tella are both useful for recording and sharing polished videos, but they have different strengths.
Tella is a managed video recording and editing platform focused on creators, tutorials, product videos, and polished presentations. Cap is a better fit if you want an open-source screen recorder with self-hosting options and more control over your video stack.
| Feature | Cap | Tella |
|---|---|---|
| Main use case | Open-source screen recording and async sharing | Polished video recording and editing |
| Deployment | Cloud or self-hosted | Managed SaaS |
| Source code | Open source | Proprietary |
| Self-hosting | Yes | No |
| Editing | Studio Mode, trims, captions, chapters | Strong managed editing experience |
| Best for | Teams wanting ownership and self-hosting | Creators wanting polished video workflows with less setup |
Screen Studio is known for polished screen recordings, especially for product demos and creator videos. Cap overlaps with this use case but adds open-source code and self-hosting.
Choose Screen Studio if you want a highly polished managed desktop recording experience.
Choose Cap if you want an open-source alternative with instant sharing, Studio Mode, and control over hosting.
Descript is not a direct Loom replacement. It is broader: video editing, audio editing, transcription, podcast editing, and content production.
Cap is more focused on screen recording, async video messages, instant sharing, and self-hostable video infrastructure.
Choose Descript if your main need is editing, transcription, and content production.
Choose Cap if your main need is open-source screen recording and Loom-style async sharing.
| Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| License | MIT for the desktop app; AGPL-3.0 for Cap Web |
| Category | Screen recording / Async video |
| Main users | Teams, creators, developers, educators, support teams |
| Platforms | macOS and Windows |
| Deployment | Cap Cloud or self-hosted Cap Web |
| Self-hosted | Yes |
| Stack | Rust, Tauri, TypeScript, Next.js, SolidStart, MySQL |
| Video infrastructure | MySQL, MinIO, FFmpeg, S3-compatible storage |
| Alternatives | Loom, Tella, Screen Studio, Descript |
Cap can be self-hosted by teams that want more control over video hosting, storage, data ownership, and sharing infrastructure.
A typical self-hosted Cap setup includes:
Self-hosting Cap is a good fit for teams that need privacy, ownership, internal video sharing, or control over where recordings are stored.
For simpler usage, Cap Cloud is better if you want managed hosting and less operational work.
Yes. Cap is an open-source alternative to Loom for screen recording, async video messages, instant sharing, and team communication. Cap is especially relevant if you want self-hosting and more control over your video infrastructure.
Yes. Cap is open source. The project includes MIT and AGPL-3.0 licensed components, depending on the part of the product.
Yes. Cap Web can be self-hosted with Docker Compose. Self-hosting lets teams control video storage, hosting, server configuration, and data ownership.
Cap is open source and can be self-hosted, while Loom is a proprietary managed SaaS product. Cap is better for teams that want ownership and control. Loom is better for teams that want a fully managed async video platform with minimal setup.
Yes. Cap can be used as an alternative to Tella for screen recording and polished video sharing. Tella is a managed product focused on creator-friendly video production, while Cap is open source and self-hostable.
Yes. Cap can be used as an alternative to Screen Studio, especially if you want open-source code, self-hosting, instant sharing links, and a cross-platform roadmap. Screen Studio is especially strong for polished Mac-based recordings.
Only partially. Descript is mainly an audio and video editing platform with transcription and content production features. Cap is primarily a screen recorder and async video sharing tool.
Yes, Cap can be used in production. For production self-hosting, teams should plan for MySQL, object storage, FFmpeg, custom domain configuration, HTTPS, monitoring, backups, and storage costs.
Cap is useful for teams, creators, developers, educators, and support teams that need screen recording, async video messages, product demos, onboarding videos, bug reports, or internal knowledge sharing.
The closest alternatives are Loom, Tella, Screen Studio, and Descript. Loom is the main managed async video platform. Tella and Screen Studio are strong for polished recording workflows. Descript is stronger for editing, transcription, and content production.